Economics
© InnoTrans
Material in Norwegian
Kapasitet - Kostnad og byggetid - Time Schedule & Finance
Extensive Excel spreadsheets ('regneark')
- only available by request and on CD.
Please save on computer before opening (opening from CD is not optimal).PRT economics for the Fornebu project
- as an alternative to traditional automated monorail
(NPV, IRR and many other issues are investigated)- for Kolsås as an alternative to LRT
(- different traffic density, capacity requirement, length of networks and length of average trip)- and for Bergen - as an alternative to LRT - 'bybanen'
(- different traffic density, capacity requirement, length of networks and length of average trip)
Comparative materialCost comparisons (Pass. cost per km etc.)
- for Fornebu, Kolsås and Bergen, for Fornebu (Intamin vs. Taxi2000) and more general figuresMaterials cost comparisons
(aluminum vs. steel etc)
Swedish reports2003 A Comparison of Costs between Bus, PRT, LRT and Metro/rail (by Transek, the largest private transport consultancy in Sweden.)
"Investment costs – PRT three times cheaper than other systems"
"Operating & Maintenance costs – PRT 40% cheaper"
1999 Personal Rapid Transit in Stockholm: Market Demand and Economic Viability (by Transek, Stockholm)
Older Taxi2000 studies (1999)Capital costs for Hong Kong
O&M costs (Operation and Maintenance)
Older material - from the SporTaxi project in Oslo :
Illustrations - Documents
Contact
www.InnoTrans.net